<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Director's Blog</title><description><![CDATA[BlogMapProvider]]></description><link>http://cwpac1.cewd.com/Blog/4f184fed-969d-4359-91df-627f0ac09a75.aspx.aspx</link><language>en-us</language><generator>Parallels Plesk Sitebuilder 4.2 for Windows (Blog module v4.2.102.20314)</generator><item><title>Sen. Reid Hits the Ground Running in Uphill Re-Election Bid</title><pubDate>Tuesday, 30 December 2008 03:08:20</pubDate><description><![CDATA[

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">That’s
the headline on </span><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123033501646236333.html"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">an article</span></a><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;"> linked from <em style="">The Drudge Report</em> for the last couple of
days. <o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">But
if it’s true, what does it mean for those of us who are pro-life and
pro-family?<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">A
recent poll taken by Research 2000 suggests that Senator Harry Reid’s
(D-Nevada) re-election is not the slam dunk he would like it to be.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">The
<em style="">Wall Street Journal</em> article
referenced Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) as another Senate Leader
(Republican Leader) who faced a similar dilemma in 2008.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>The only problem is that 2008 was definitely
a Democrat year, and there were very few Republican incumbents — especially in
the U.S. Senate — that didn’t have a competitive race.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Even Saxby Chambliss (R-Georgia), whose re-election
should never have been in doubt, was forced into a run-off. <span style="">&nbsp;</span>Fortunately, the pro-life Chambliss had one of
the more radical pro-abortion challengers of 2008 as his competition. <span style="">&nbsp;</span>As soon as the word got out on his opponent, the
Chambliss re-election was no longer a problem.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">The
curious thing about this poll, which has Sen. Reid and others up in arms, is
that it was taken on November 30th of this year — just after the Obama, liberal
Democrat landside.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Reid’s re-elect
numbers ought to be so much better.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">Instead
you have Sen. Reid on the short end of poll numbers at 46-40 percent, with the
only high number being the 54 percent disapproval rating of the job he’s doing.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">That’s
the good news.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">The
bad news is that the candidate put up against Sen. Reid in the poll is no
friend to the pro-family, pro-life movement.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">Congressman
Jon Porter (R-Nevada) just lost re-election in the third district in Nevada,
and he is the one matched up against Reid.<span style="">&nbsp;
</span>The other candidate, Lt. Governor <span class="storymainbodyfont">Brian
Krolicki (R)</span>, is reportedly under a cloud of suspicion and could soon be
under indictment.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>That might just end
his bid as a candidate for U.S. Senate in 2010 — unless of course he can
exonerate himself pretty quickly. <span style="">&nbsp;</span>Krolicki claims that Reid is behind the
investigation. <o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">So
right now, you and I are stuck with former Congressman Jon Porter.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Take a look at his </span><a href="http://cwfa.capwiz.com/bio/id/6778"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">CWALAC scorecard</span></a><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;"> on the issues you and I care about.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">This
brings us to the next question: What do we do with this opportunity?<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">Rest
assured we are doing everything we can to find a suitable candidate to run
against Sen. Reid, and already there is really good news on that front, so
please stay tuned.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">But
what would happen if we weren’t able to find a suitable opponent for Senator
Reid and this critical race in 2010?<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">Well,
nothing. …<span style="">&nbsp; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><em style=""><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">You mean you will just let Sen.
Reid win?<span style="">&nbsp; </span>Don’t you want Republicans to
win?<o:p></o:p></span></em></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">Not
really. …<span style="">&nbsp; </span>You see, CWPAC isn’t a Republican
organization. <o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">It
is true that all of our endorsed candidates are Republicans, but that’s only
because the Republican Party is more conducive to our values at this time in
history.<span style="">&nbsp; </span>There are a few Democrats in
Congress whom we would consider “friendly” on some issues, but we would be hard
pressed to find a 100 percenter.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><em style=""><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">So CWPAC wouldn’t support
Jon Porter, if he was “the best we could do” against Sen. Reid?<o:p></o:p></span></em></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">Nope.
… <span style="">&nbsp;</span>Not with a vote in favor of the
so-called Employment Non-Discrimination Act, “Hate Crimes” and a vote in favor
of the destructive Embryonic Stem Cell Research Act.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">But
then, we don’t need to.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">You
see, we have 435 seats up in 2010 and at least 35 seats in the Senate.<span style="">&nbsp; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">Surely
there will be competitive seats where there is a clear choice and a pro-family,
pro-life candidate running that CWPAC could endorse and our members would feel
confident that they were supporting a true conservative.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">That’s
why CWPAC doesn’t endorse everyone who runs. <span style="">&nbsp;</span>We have plenty of races to choose from, and we
just won’t ever feel comfortable endorsing the “lesser of two evils.”<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;;">I
am hopeful that we may have found a proven conservative candidate to run in the
U.S. Senate race in Nevada in 2010 that is pro-life and pro-family. <span style="">&nbsp;</span>But if not, there will be other races in 2010.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 7.5pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; color: black;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<br/><table cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%"><tr><td><a href="http://cwpac1.cewd.com/Blog/4f184fed-969d-4359-91df-627f0ac09a75.aspx/2008/12/30/767d520b-7d16-4c1f-bd79-a76ae498eeeb.aspx">Comments (0)</a></td></tr></table>]]></description><link>http://cwpac1.cewd.com/Blog/4f184fed-969d-4359-91df-627f0ac09a75.aspx/2008/12/30/767d520b-7d16-4c1f-bd79-a76ae498eeeb.aspx</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://cwpac1.cewd.com/Blog/4f184fed-969d-4359-91df-627f0ac09a75.aspx/2008/12/30/767d520b-7d16-4c1f-bd79-a76ae498eeeb.aspx</guid></item><item><title>Welcome to CWPAC Director's Blog</title><pubDate>Tuesday, 15 July 2008 05:02:10</pubDate><description><![CDATA[
<meta content=Word.Document name=ProgId>
<meta content="Microsoft Word 12" name=Generator>
<meta content="Microsoft Word 12" name=Originator><link href="file:///C:%5CUsers%5CPeter%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_filelist.xml" rel=File-List><link href="file:///C:%5CUsers%5CPeter%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_themedata.thmx" rel=themeData><link href="file:///C:%5CUsers%5CPeter%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip_colorschememapping.xml" rel=colorSchemeMapping>
<style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
	{font-family:"Cambria Math";
	panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;
	mso-font-charset:1;
	mso-generic-font-family:roman;
	mso-font-format:other;
	mso-font-pitch:variable;
	mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
	mso-font-charset:0;
	mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
	mso-font-pitch:variable;
	mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{mso-style-priority:1;
	mso-style-unhide:no;
	mso-style-qformat:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	margin-top:0in;
	margin-right:0in;
	margin-bottom:10.0pt;
	margin-left:0in;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-priority:99;
	mso-style-unhide:no;
	color:blue;
	mso-themecolor:hyperlink;
	text-decoration:underline;
	text-underline:single;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-priority:99;
	color:purple;
	mso-themecolor:followedhyperlink;
	text-decoration:underline;
	text-underline:single;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	mso-default-props:yes;
	mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;
	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
.MsoPapDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	margin-bottom:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;
	mso-header-margin:.5in;
	mso-footer-margin:.5in;
	mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>

<p class=MsoNormal>Welcome to the new and improved Concerned Women Political Action Committee (CWPAC) blog.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>CWPAC’s aim is to help elect solid pro-life, pro-family conservative leaders who will not just be a vote, but a strong voice in Congress for our values.<span>&nbsp; </span>We do that by bringing conservative donors with conservative candidates and inviting people who agree to support those candidates with their resources.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>We will continue every week to update our site and bring you even more candidates that you can help elect with your contributions.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>I hope today as you look around the site, you will bookmark us a favorite place on the web for you to come back to weekly.<span>&nbsp; </span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>I have had the privilege of working for Beverly LaHaye as Executive Director of the Political Action Committee she founded in 2002, since 2006.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The idea from day one has always been to find the best, most conservative candidates out there and then let our members know about them.<span>&nbsp; </span>I am excited about the re-launch of the website because it enables us to talk to even more people looking for good solid candidates and future leaders of our country.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>I hope you will tell your friends about <a href="http://cwalac.org/">CWALAC</a> and encourage them to visit.<span>&nbsp; </span>In order for your friends to be a member of CWPAC, they first must be a member of CWALAC. Make a donation to that organization and as an added benefit, they will be members of CWPAC. With membership in the PAC, you will be able to find out more information on the candidates and hot races in the country.<span>&nbsp; </span>And my hope is that you will support these candidates with your hard earned money and help them get elected and re-elected.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Every election year it seems as if “this is the most important election” ever.<span>&nbsp; </span>And maybe, just maybe 2008 is that election.<span>&nbsp; </span>The stakes couldn’t be higher.<span>&nbsp; </span>The next President of the United States could have as many as four appointments to make onto the U.S. Supreme Court.<span>&nbsp; </span>Not only that, Republicans, who are more often conservative on the issues you and I care about more than democrats, stand to lose 20-25 seats in the house and come close to only holding 41 or 42 seats in the U.S. Senate.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>So yes, the stakes are pretty high aren’t they?</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>So, please by all means poke around, check out our <strong><u>Members area<span>&nbsp; </span></u></strong>and when you are finished – on your way out – why not make a <strong><u>contribution on our secure site</u></strong> and help CWPAC continue their programs and help bring you the best conservative candidates in the most competitive races in the country.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Thanks again, and come back real soon</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><?xml:namespace prefix = o /><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Mike Mears</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Executive Director </p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Concerned Women Political Action Committee (CWPAC)</p><br/><table cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%"><tr><td><a href="http://cwpac1.cewd.com/Blog/4f184fed-969d-4359-91df-627f0ac09a75.aspx/2008/07/15/f3860f47-c395-4b2d-9e57-46db1980fd64.aspx">Comments (0)</a></td></tr></table>]]></description><link>http://cwpac1.cewd.com/Blog/4f184fed-969d-4359-91df-627f0ac09a75.aspx/2008/07/15/f3860f47-c395-4b2d-9e57-46db1980fd64.aspx</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://cwpac1.cewd.com/Blog/4f184fed-969d-4359-91df-627f0ac09a75.aspx/2008/07/15/f3860f47-c395-4b2d-9e57-46db1980fd64.aspx</guid></item></channel></rss>